Comments on: Dave Meslin on designing for intentional exclusion https://www.90percentofeverything.com/2011/05/03/dave-meslin-on-designing-for-intentional-exclusion/ User Experience Design, Research & Good Old Fashioned Usability Wed, 01 May 2019 06:04:05 +0000 hourly 1 By: Dries https://www.90percentofeverything.com/2011/05/03/dave-meslin-on-designing-for-intentional-exclusion/#comment-172133 Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:18:39 +0000 http://www.90percentofeverything.com/?p=5304#comment-172133 spot on.

]]> By: Torontoguy https://www.90percentofeverything.com/2011/05/03/dave-meslin-on-designing-for-intentional-exclusion/#comment-159080 Fri, 06 May 2011 12:44:17 +0000 http://www.90percentofeverything.com/?p=5304#comment-159080 I’d vote for it too. Intentional exclusion is, by definition, a form of bullying. Google the term and you’ll find the connection to bullies of any sort — even those in government and business.

]]> By: Harry Brignull https://www.90percentofeverything.com/2011/05/03/dave-meslin-on-designing-for-intentional-exclusion/#comment-158903 Wed, 04 May 2011 08:07:46 +0000 http://www.90percentofeverything.com/?p=5304#comment-158903 Me.

]]> By: Cennydd https://www.90percentofeverything.com/2011/05/03/dave-meslin-on-designing-for-intentional-exclusion/#comment-158795 Tue, 03 May 2011 11:40:48 +0000 http://www.90percentofeverything.com/?p=5304#comment-158795 Absolutely right.

But inclusion requires more staff and therefore money. In short, if government used design this way taxes would probably have to rise. And who’d vote for that?

]]>