Yes, the UK needs new investment into the rail lines, but putting in two new slow speed lines will give far higher capacity at a lower cost. As you say, speed isn’t everything.
In fact when I travel to the UK from Holland, I choose the train whenever the tickets are exorbitant (biggest issue with trains) because I can do work on the journey. Does an hour here or there make a big difference to that decision? Not for me. I care that my time is useful on the train and pretty much wasted in air travel.
]]>I mostly agree an your point of view. It hardly makes sense to spend that much money (and let’s be honest: the real costs will probably be much higher) just to shave of a few minutes. It is more the overall train experience that needs to be improved. Models and champaign… ok, that would definitly get me on a train :-)
In Germany we had similar discussions about fast track trains connecting cities or cities with their airports. So far, it didn’t go well for the trains… I assume it will be the same in the UK this time.
To make trains more competitive compared to airplanes, pricing and service are much likely a more effective way to tackle the declining passenger numbers. Free WIFI in stations and on trains, better seating organization in rush hours, less delays etc… All that would help a lot I believe.
Bye
Czar
For full details of the values used by the department of transport see here.
]]>