Best,
KH
I think Morae is too expensive for what it does.
Here’s what I did with a banana holder (less glam than the acrylic molded over a toaster!) and existing equipment and software I had on hand to do recording on a Mac (looks like AmCap is Windows only and Camtasia is much more expensive than Silverback for recording picture in picture video)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lwaldal/4900501706/
The biggest problem isn’t recording 2 streams, it’s broadcasting them to remote teams at the same time – with 2 camera feeds, Quicktime Recorder, and either Ustream or GoToMeeting running, my poor (brand new!) MacBook Pro slows to a crawl.
We’ve taken to using 2 computers to reduce lag, but it’s still not ideal.
Thoughts?
]]>With handheld and touch screen devices you do need both cameras to realistically convey the expedience and interaction, so a mixer, Morae or the software you mention is required, but you don’t want your camera setup to change the way people hold or interact with the device, especially with switching between landscape and portrait.
I’ve recently made filming setups for capturing tablet use during UX research projects with iPad apps etc. and went through a fair bit of trial and error.. including these two…
1. Head mounted cameras free the device of ‘strap-ons’ but the moderator becomes the star of the show when participants eyeball you instead of the device as they tell their story.
2. Mounting the user-facing camera on the handheld device sounds like an option, but you end up with seasickness-inducing footage.
I ended up making a custom iPad filming rig which seemed to do the trick nicely.
As an alternative you can try mounting a webcam on a boom between the participant and the device and asking the participant to ‘hold it roughly in this area please’ to keep it in shot.
]]>We actually posted about this over on the HumanCentric blog:
http://blog.humancentric.com/record-two-camera-feeds-using-only-free-software/
We were able to do two cameras for free and make the final recording look somewhat nice.
]]>