Telephones, voicemail, fax, SMS and (I think) Google Wave are all platform products. Their point is to enable other people to do other things using the platform, and, nobody is smart enough to predict all the things other people will do (or be willing to pay for) on a platform once it’s out there.
Of course, this makes planning for adoption a lot higher risk.
But, if you win with a platform, you tend to win BIG.
]]>On the flipside, is the danger here that we have the old arrogant technologist’s fallacy that ‘people will want it when we explain to them what it does’? The great masses are disruptive in their usage of technology, as much as the technology itself disrupts. British Telecom for example conceived SMS as a business tool, yet it was adopted by kids who owned phones but couldn’t afford extortionate call charges.
I wonder how much of the telephone’s common uses were actually predicted by Bell?
]]>